In Review: The Aragon Divemaster 4

I’m a sucker for giant watches.

But I’m not a sucker.

When I noticed the Aragon Divemaster 4 automated chrono on eBay I used to be intrigued. It wasn’t inexpensive — they’re $1,500 on the location — however for $500 on eBay I figured I may take a flyer on this factor and see what was up. The watch arrived and it was, to say the least, disappointing.

Aragon has a variety of watches in varied coloration methods and so they enchantment to the start collector. They’re huge, beefy, and daring and the pricing, factoring in large eBay reductions, makes it appear to be you’re getting one thing particular. Like Steinhart and the opposite “minimize out the intermediary” sellers, Aragon overpromises and under-delivers.

Bottom Line? It Sucks

What’s my beef? Well, the motion is junk. It’s sloppy, it loses a couple of minutes day by day, and all the factor doesn’t want the huge case Aragon has given it. Setting the time was an journey in estimation since there was an excessive amount of play within the crown. The design is ugly — not Seiko Orange Monster ugly however simply ugly — and the metallic is matte as a result of it might probably’t be shiny. All instructed, you’re getting a really low cost look ahead to a bit greater than you’d pay for the same name-brand Seiko or Tissot.

Should I be this harsh on a micro model? No, however this instance of micro model cost-cutting was significantly galling. These aren’t $1,500 watches and I’d wager they’re not even $500 watches. They’re commodity items barely modified and given a Japanese motion. If the corporate put some thought into design and manufacturing and diminished its line to some basic items I’d in all probability be extra prepared to provide them a break however take a look at this mess:

Chefs all the time warn you about locations with big menus. This place has an enormous menu. None of those watches characteristic something near consideration to element and high quality management and it’s fairly irritating. By no means do I wish to disparage the work of a small producer however Aragon has taken a leaf from the mall kiosk watch playbook and modified it to make the collector set a bit extra . These are automated watches and all people is aware of autos are higher than quartz. But why not make all the package deal superior? Why depend upon a scattershot strategy of providing a large number of types in hopes that somebody needs a large purple watch that doesn’t hold good time?

We’re a watch overview website. We often write about watches we like. But on this case I hated the Aragon Divemaster 4. It’s an insult to watchmaking, it’s a large number, and it’s costly. There is not any larger drive on this planet for a watchmaker than the help of followers. This firm, given its sloppiness, doesn’t deserve that help.

Thank you for studying this WristWatchReview publish. With so many issues competing for everybody’s consideration lately, we actually recognize you giving us your time. We work exhausting on daily basis to place high quality content material on the market for our group.

WristWatchReview is likely one of the few remaining actually impartial watch information retailers. We should not have a large company behind us, and we rely closely on our group to help us, in an age when advertisers are more and more tired of sponsoring small, impartial watch websites — particularly a website like ours that’s unwilling to tug punches in its reporting and evaluation. We do not play the video games the opposite websites play and we have paid for it in relation to advert income.

We would love so that you can help us on Patreon and each little bit helps. Thank you.

–The WWR Team

Source link

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart