
Winner: TicWatch S2
Despite its disappointing software program efficiency, the variety of options packed on the S2 simply makes it a greater smartwatch in comparison with the GTX.
TicWatch GTX vs. TicWatch S2

Mobvoi is usually identified for its high-end TicWatch smartwatches. They stand on the forefront of innovation and are an organization that’s identified for all the time introducing revolutionary options such because the TicWatch Pro’s dual-display.
But this time round, Mobvoi is trying to prolong their smartwatch attain within the funds market by providing the TicWatch GTX and S2. The GTX is a competitively priced entry-level smartwatch that delivers fundamental options, whereas the S2 is a full-fledged Wear OS smartwatch.
In this text, we will probably be serving to you resolve which one higher suits your wants. We’ll undergo the construct high quality, options, and software program efficiency. And hopefully, by the tip of our comparability, you’ll stroll away with one of the best smartwatch for you.
For a extra in-depth look, see our TicWatch GTX evaluation or our Ticwatch S2 Review right here.
Please be aware, we bought the TicWatch GTX and S2 immediately from mobvoi.com, click on right here to examine their present costs.
TicWatch Brand Overview

Mobvoi Information Technology Company Limited is a tech firm based mostly in Beijing, China. They had been based in 2012 by Google AI specialists, Nokia staff, and researchers from prime universities corresponding to Harvard and Cambridge. The main objective of this firm is the mixing and development of voice AI communication.
It was in 2014 when Mobvoi began venturing into the patron electronics market. They developed an Android-based smartwatch working system known as TicWear OS. And quickly after, they labored along with Frog Design to launch the TicWatch.
The TicWatch model differentiated itself from different smartwatches by having a robust integration with their AI expertise. Its launch was very profitable and solely trails behind the Apple Watch within the home Chinese market.
Today, Mobvoi continues to convey its experience to the smartwatch market with the newer variations of the TicWatch. And with every new iteration, TicWatch will get one step nearer to fulfilling its dream of ushering within the subsequent era of human and laptop interplay.
Packaging and Unboxing Experience – Revise

Winner: TicWatch S2
As we all the time point out, the unboxing expertise is usually irrelevant to the worth proposition of the product. However, we extremely worth them since they offer the customers a primary have a look at their product. And on this case, the packaging alone makes it clear that one among these merchandise is superior.
The extraordinarily budget-priced TicWatch GTX does an ideal job given its value constraints. It has the identical normal design philosophy because the higher-end TicWatch fashions. It sports activities an all-black end with a comparatively clear design. The inside a part of the packaging is much less spectacular however nonetheless will get the job completed.
The Huawei Watch GT 2, then again, takes issues to the subsequent stage. It has a packaging that’s similar to Huawei’s high-end smartphones. Most customers may even assume that the GT 2 is a part of Huawei’s premium choices based mostly on the packaging alone.
Everything from the outside to the inside of the field feels premium. Even the way in which the GT 2 is introduced makes you need to instantly expertise the smartwatch.
Overall, each firms did properly by way of packaging. However, the GT 2 pulls forward due to its extra high-quality presentation.
Design and Build Quality

Overall Winner: TicWatch S2
The TicWatch GTX has a really spectacular design that’s virtually harking back to Huawei’s premium Watch GT 2. It is predicated on the basic wristwatch look and even sports activities engravings on the watch face. Of course, these aren’t fairly as genuine because the Watch GT 2, however they’re a welcome addition to the GTX.
Additionally, the TicWatch GTX has two facet buttons. This was a nice shock contemplating the TicWatch E2 and S2 solely had a single facet button. And by way of supplies, the GTX is made with a mix of metallic and plastic.
The total construct could be very spectacular for a funds smartwatch, and we consider that it’ll survive most customers’ each day routines. However, when in comparison with the higher-priced GT 2, the constraints of the GTX begin to present.
The Ticwatch S2’s design and construct high quality is a step up from the GTX. However, its total construct is sort of lackluster in comparison with its rivals.
Its construct is extra fundamental and never as daring because the budget-priced GTX. The complete watch is fabricated from plastic which doesn’t look as nice as watches fabricated from aluminum. And whereas It does have a US Military Standard 810G Rating, it doesn’t really feel very stable.
Additionally, the TicWatch E2 solely has a single facet button. This is odd since even the GTX has extra buttons than the E2. And this does have a big impact on the S2’s usability since having a second button helps pace up UI navigation.
And as a sports activities watch, that second button might have been assigned to rapidly entry well being and health apps. After all, the S2 is meant for health lovers.
In phrases of its design, Mobvoi has added some aptitude to the TicWatch S2’s design. The bezel has some markings, and the watch case is bulkier, giving it that sports activities watch aesthetic. The strap additionally has some fascinating patterns that give it extra texture.
But total, the TicWatch S2’s design is fairly lackluster. It is extra stable than the entry-level GTX, however it feels such as you nonetheless aren’t reaching the standard that high-end TicWatch fashions supply.
Display Quality

Winner: TicWatch S2
The TicWatch S2 has a transparent edge, on condition that it makes use of an AMOLED show. It could be very properly carried out and is able to displaying sharp and vibrant photographs. Throughout our testing, we discovered that the S2 will get very brilliant and may simply be seen each in indoor and brilliant out of doors environments.
Additionally, the TicWatch S2 makes use of Corning Gorilla Glass 3 to guard its display. This signifies that minor bumps and drops shouldn’t harm the watch and thus offers you the arrogance to make use of it open air.
The TicWatch GTX, then again, solely makes use of a TFT LCD show. This isn’t normally an issue since a variety of TFT shows can nonetheless look good with correct implementation. But sadly, the GTX’s show doesn’t get very brilliant and solely has three brightness ranges.
And in fact, it’s no match when it’s immediately in comparison with the sharpness and vibrance of the S2’s show. It does its job, however it isn’t able to doing any miracles.
Features

Winner: TicWatch S2
The TicWatch GTX has a wonderful function set for its value. But with that mentioned, the TicWatch S2 simply beats it in the case of its options. In reality, the S2 beats most elementary watches within the sub $200 value vary.
The GTX covers many of the fundamental options. It has restricted notification assist that’s solely able to displaying notifications from allowed apps. There isn’t any possibility to reply to them.
It additionally has an optical coronary heart fee sensor in addition to a built-in accelerometer. The GTX additionally has fundamental options corresponding to a stopwatch, timer, climate, flashlight, and discover my telephone. It additionally has music management which is good to have however a function that I usually don’t discover helpful. It has no inner storage and can’t hook up with Bluetooth headphones.
That’s just about it. It is sufficient for customers coming from sensible bands/health trackers or customers with fundamental wants.
The TicWatch S2, then again, is rather more highly effective due to its Google Wear OS working system. For a full listing of options, you may try our evaluation. But in a nutshell, this smartwatch is mainly a miniature Android machine.
Just like with fashionable Android smartphones, the S2 offers you the choice to reply to notifications by way of textual content enter, voice, or on-screen gestures. Additionally, the TicWatch S2 has entry to the Google Play Store, giving it the flexibility to put in apps.
We had been capable of finding the whole lot from great-looking watch faces corresponding to A/D Watch Faces and Google Pixel Watch Face to distinctive apps corresponding to “Drink Water Reminder” and the “Wash Hands Reminder.”
The solely attainable edge that the GTX has over the S2 is the built-in sleep monitoring function. However, we predict that the GTX’s sleep monitoring function isn’t on par with higher-end watches as we famous in our evaluation of the Huawei Watch GT 2 2
Health and Fitness Tracking

Winner: TicWatch S2
The TicWatch S2 simply takes the cake in the case of well being and health monitoring. Not solely does it give glorious well being monitoring and health actions by way of Mobvoi and Google’s first-party software program, however it additionally offers you the flexibility to put in third-party apps that provide much more exercise routines. Additionally, the TicWatch S2 has built-in GPS, that means you may go away your smartphone behind throughout runs.
The well being and monitoring options of the GTX, then again. Is very properly carried out. It has a coronary heart fee sensor in addition to assist for health monitoring actions. However, it solely has 14 exercise modes. It covers the fundamentals, however even a extra fundamental health tracker has extra actions obtainable.
Watch Software Performance

Overall Winner: TicWatch S2
Surprisingly, the TicWatch GTX pulls forward of the S2 in the case of efficiency. However, because of the lack of options, it nonetheless isn’t sufficient to beat the TicWatch S2.
The TicWatch GTX makes use of proprietary software program that’s similar to the GT 2’s Light OS. Navigation could be very easy and straightforward to get used to. There are some design parts which are just like the icons used on the Wear OS TicWatch fashions, which definitely assist give the OS some aptitude.
Navigation could be very clean, and through our testing, the watch was free from random crashes. Unfortunately, the identical factor can’t be mentioned with the TicWatch S2.
The TicWatch makes use of the older Snapdragon 2100 processor and solely pairs it with 500 MB of RAM. These aren’t sufficient to run Wear OS easily. And consequently, the OS could be very sluggish.
And by sluggish, we imply body drops and slowdowns throughout common use. Also, opening apps is sort of gradual. And worst of all, opening apps such because the Google Play Store generally results in a crash.
The watch continues to be usable. And there are even some methods to probably pace up the Wear OS expertise. You can go to developer choices to regulate animations. However, we consider {that a} good product needs to be able to exit of the field and mustn’t want consumer modifications to make it usable.
Watch Faces

Winner: TicWatch S2
The watch face part is one other space the place the TicWatch S2 proves that it’s a significantly better watch than the GTX. The S2 already affords nice choices proper out of the field. But by third-party apps discovered on the Play Store, you may really customise the watch to suit your aesthetics.
Lots of apps corresponding to A/D Watch Faces, Facer, and the Pixel Watch Face supply loads of choices. Facer, specifically, has all kinds of choices, together with easy and stylish watch faces to flashy and futuristic-looking watch faces.
Of course, we don’t suggest watch faces which have too many on-screen parts since it will probably decelerate the watch. But once more, merely having the choice beats out any of the GTX’s watch faces.
And talking of the GTX, not solely does it lack customized watch faces, however it even lacks a devoted watch face retailer. What you get proper out of the field are the one watch faces which you can apply.
And the worst half is that syncing watch faces might take a number of minutes. This lengthy course of has discouraged us from even attempting out each watch face that the GTX has to supply.
Battery Life

Winner: TicWatch GTX
The one space the place the GTX really outshines the TicWatch S2 is the battery life. The GTX can simply last as long as per week. This signifies that you received’t be carrying one other machine that must be continuously recharged. Of course, this can be a given because the GTX doesn’t have too many options.
The Ticwatch S2, then again, solely lasts for a most of two days. This could appear acceptable on condition that it’s a Wear OS watch. However, a variety of customers could discover the fixed have to recharge the watch to be very annoying. And because the watch’s efficiency isn’t very quick both, we want that the battery life can be prolonged a bit.
In phrases of their chargers, each the GTX and S2’s chargers aren’t nice. They each function non-removable cables, which makes them a ache to hold round.
Another factor to pay attention to is that the magnets on the GTX aren’t very robust. However, this isn’t a problem for the GTX, contemplating that you just solely ever see it as soon as per week.
Comparison Winner: TicWatch S2
The TicWatch GTX is an excellent fundamental entry-level smartwatch. Compared to its rivals, the aesthetics and the general worth that the GTX brings to the desk are merely unbeatable. However, when in comparison with Mobvoi’s entry-level Wear OS watch, the GTX merely falls flat.
The solely options the place it beats the S2 are with its snappy OS and battery life. However, if performance is what you’re in search of, the S2 simply beats the GTX.
If you’re in search of a fundamental smartwatch that’s able to matching the S2, we extremely suggest trying out the Huawei Watch GT 2e or Huawei Watch GT 2 for a direct comparability to the Ticwatch S2.
Specifications
| Mobvoi TicWatch GTX
|
Mobvoi TicWatch S2
|
|
| Brand | Mobvoi | Mobvoi |
| Model | TicWatch GTX | TicWatch S2 |
| Screen Size | 1.28” TFT LCD | 1.39” AMOLED Display |
| Screen Protection | No Official Certification | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Screen Resolution | 240 x 240 pixel | 400 x 400 pixel |
| Pixel Density | – | 407 PPI |
| Input Type | 2 Physical Buttons | 1 bodily button/Touch Screen |
| Watch Dimensions | 48.7 x 48.7 x 11mm | 46.6 x 51.8 x 12.9mm |
| Weight | 57.6 grams | 53.2 grams |
| Watch Case Material | Stainless Steel | Polyamide & glass fiber |
| Bezel Material | Stainless Steel | Polycarbonate |
| Watch Design | Circular, Curved | Circular, Curved |
| Strap Size | 20 mm | 22 mm |
| Watch Colors | Black | Midnight(black), Glacier(white) |
| Water Resistance | IP68 | Waterproof (5ATM) |
| Swim-proof | Not advisable | Yes, advisable |
| NFC | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| GPS | No | With GLONASS |
| CONNECTIVITY
Wi-fi |
No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| SENSORS Accelerometer | Yes | Yes |
| Heart Rate | Yes | Yes |
| Compass | No | No |
| Gyroscope | No | Yes |
| Altimeter | No | No |
| SPO2 | No | No |
| Elevation | No | Yes |
| Ambient Light | No | No |
| Barometer | No | No |
| FITNESS TRACKING
Sleep monitoring |
Yes | Yes |
| Steps | Yes | Yes |
| Floors Climbed | No | No |
| Heart Rate Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Calories | Yes | Yes |
| Distance | Yes | Yes |
| Stress | No | Yes |
| VO2 Max | – | Yes |
| Blood Oxygen | No | No |
| Blood Pressure | No | No |
| Menstrual cycle monitoring | No | No |
| Swim monitoring | No | No |
| Underwater coronary heart fee
monitoring |
No | No |
| On-screen exercise modes | No | No |
| Triathlon mode | No | No |
| ECG monitoring | No | No |
| Preloaded sport modes | Yes | Yes |
| Safety monitoring | No | No |
| Battery Life | Regular: as much as 7 days
Battery Saver Mode: 10 days |
Standby: 2 days+; Mixed utilization: 1 day+ |
| Battery Technology | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Charging Time | About 1-2 Hours | About 1-2 Hours |
| Charging Type | USB based mostly charging dock | USB based mostly charging dock |
| Compatible OS | Android
iOS |
Android
iOS |
| NOTIFICATIONS
Email Alert |
Yes | Yes |
| SMS Alert | Yes | Yes |
| Calls Alert | Yes | Yes |
| Event Reminder | Yes | Yes |
| Weather | Yes | Yes |
| Third-party Apps | Yes | Yes |
| MEDIA
Audio |
No | mp3/mp4 |
| Music Streaming | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth Music | No | Yes |
| Radio | No | No |
| Loud Speaker | No | Yes |
| Microphone | No | Yes |
| CLOCK FEATURES
Time/Date |
Yes | Yes |
| Stopwatch | Yes | Yes |
| Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| OTHER FUNCTIONS Control digicam | No | Yes |
| Music Control | Yes | Yes |
| Find Phone | Yes | Yes |
| Text Response | No | Yes(Android Only) |
| Answer Call | No | Yes |
| MISC
Payment System |
No | No |
| Companion App | Mobvoi App | Mobvoi App |
| Customizable watch face | Yes | Yes |
| Interchangeable band | Yes | Yes |
| Voice command | No | Yes |
| Internal Storage | 16 MB | 4 GB |
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Wear OS by Google™ |


